
Taking terrorism on the road: American ISIS supporters and the decision whether to travel or stay home
- Callie Vitro , Camden Carmichael , Austin Doctor , Seamus Hughes
- Isis , Ftfs , Courts
- April 2026
Table of Contents
A report on the decision to travel versus act in the homeland among ISIS-inspired persons living in the United States.
Implications
ISIS-inspired and enabled individuals in the United States continue to pursue dual mobilization pathways: attempting to travel abroad and plotting attacks at home. We note that, even after the collapse of the caliphate, roughly one-third of post-2019 defendants sought to travel. At the same time, the ISIS threat has clearly not shifted exclusively in one direction. Recent cases—including the January 2025 New Orleans attack—demonstrate that individuals who remain in the United States can and do operationalize violence locally in support of ISIS. Taken together, the evidence points to a persistent dual-threat dynamic rather than a substitution effect between travel and homeland attack activity.
Distributions During Phases of the Caliphate

Full Report
Follow link below for the paper. Questions? Contact the authors.
Full PaperRelated Posts

Reintegration of foreign terrorist fighter families: A framework of best practices for the U.S.
- Austin Doctor , Haroro Ingram , Devorah Margolin , Andrew Mines , Lorenzo Vidino
- Ftfs, Reintegration
A report outlining a comprehensive framework of best practices in the reintegration of FTF families.
Read More
Dismantling terrorism through prosecutions: A case study of Atomwaffen Division
The current state of U.S. federal cases against the Atomwaffen Division
Read More
The mobility of terror: Examining the decision to travel or remain home in US ISIS cases from 2014-2025
The decision to travel versus remain home for ISIS-affiliated defendants in U.S. federal courts.
Read More