
Taking terrorism on the road: American ISIS supporters and the decision whether to travel or stay home
- Callie Vitro , Camden Carmichael , Austin Doctor , Seamus Hughes
- Isis , Ftfs , Courts
- April 2026
Table of Contents
A report on the decision to travel versus act in the homeland among ISIS-inspired persons living in the United States.
Implications
ISIS-inspired and enabled individuals in the United States continue to pursue dual mobilization pathways: attempting to travel abroad and plotting attacks at home. We note that, even after the collapse of the caliphate, roughly one-third of post-2019 defendants sought to travel. At the same time, the ISIS threat has clearly not shifted exclusively in one direction. Recent cases—including the January 2025 New Orleans attack—demonstrate that individuals who remain in the United States can and do operationalize violence locally in support of ISIS. Taken together, the evidence points to a persistent dual-threat dynamic rather than a substitution effect between travel and homeland attack activity.
Distributions During Phases of the Caliphate

Full Report
Follow link below for the report. Questions? Contact the authors.
Full ReportRelated Posts

Investigating terrorist use of improvised explosive devices in the United States: Evidence from US federal court cases, 2009–2024
Understanding terrorist use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in the United States.
Read More
U.S. Federal Cases Against ISIS Using Non-Terrorism-Related Charges
- Seamus Hughes , Callie Vitro , Camden Carmichael , Brooke Buxton , Mackenzie Harms , Austin Doctor
- Isis, Courts, Hgve
The use of non-terrorism related charges for federal ISIS-related cases.
Read More
Sentencing terrorist leaders and their followers: Evidence from Islamic State defendants in U.S. federal courts, 2014–2024
Sentencing of ISIS-affiliated defendants in U.S. federal courts.
Read More