
Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) intake, triage, and outcomes
- Jeff Gruenewald , Noah Turner , Seamus Hughes
- Sar
- April 2026
Table of Contents
This brief describes the characteristics of SARs in terms of intake, triage, and outcome
Executive Summary
The Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative (NSI) established a national infrastructure for sharing information related to terrorist activity. Fusion centers facilitate the receipt, investigation, documentation, and sharing of suspicious activity reports, or SARs. Eighty fusion centers currently operate across the United States, but research into how these centers process SARs is limited. Using closed-source data on SARs from two fusion centers, this brief describes the characteristics of SARs in terms of intake, triage, and outcome.
The purpose of this brief is to help policymakers involved in the NSI program understand key patterns in suspicious activity reports (SARs), including how they are identified, reported, reviewed, and acted on by fusion centers.
Key Takeaways
- Most SAR reports are not connected to terrorism but are often connected to threats of serious violence like school violence, mass violence, or other targeted attacks.
- Most SARs involve expressed or implied threats, often observed in person or on social media and reported by bystanders or law enforcement.
- SARs most often involve private citizens, businesses, and government entities as targets.
- About half of SARs are assigned to investigators, and over one-third are referred to other agencies.
- Less than 20% of SARs result in a subject being charged for a crime.
Full Report
Follow link below for the report. Questions? Contact the authors.
Full ReportRelated Posts

See something, say something? Examining variation in willingness to report suspicious activity to police across racial and ethnic groups
Understanding willingness to report suspicious behavior to police using an online conjoint experiment.
Read More
The mobility of terror: Examining the decision to travel or remain home in US ISIS cases from 2014-2025
The decision to travel versus remain home for ISIS-affiliated defendants in U.S. federal courts.
Read More